Hamm v. Public Service Commission
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Finney, Judge:
This is an appeal from a circuit court order reversing and remanding orders of the South Carolina Public Service Commission, which permitted a levelized surcharge based upon a combination of both the volumetric and deficiency-based systems to recover from retail gas customers take-or-pay charges incurred at the wholesale level. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
To compensate the wholesaler for risks involved in the merchandising of natural gas, the retailer agrees to take, or pay for if not taken, a minimum quantity of gas. These take-or-pay (TOP) provisions operate to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Edge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005