Legal Opinion
Manikowske v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 4, 1985No. Civ. 10891PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
Should a writ of certiorari be issued to compel a full evidentiary hearing for a claimant for workmen’s compensation benefits, where he failed to timely appeal denial of benefits by the Bureau after only an “informal hearing”? We hold that certio-rari is not available to him. Accordingly, we affirm a judgment of the district court dismissing a petition by Joseph P. Mani-kowske for a writ of certiorari.
Manikowske filed a claim for benefits with the North Dakota Workmen’s Compensation Bureau which was denied, following an informal hearing, 1 by an order dated August 1, 1979.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- State ex rel. Wehe v. FrazierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- Baker v. LenhartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- City of Fargo v. Annexation Review Commission of Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Manikowske v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tooley v. AlmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Lende v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Fargo v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Weber v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Lamplighter Lounge v. State Ex Rel. HeitkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.