Legal Opinion

Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1907No. 376PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action for damages, from city court of Vienna — Judge Henderson. February 18, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. In a suit against a railroad company for killing stock,, the court instructed the jury as follows: “If you believe from the evidence in the case, and from all the facts and surrounding circumstances, that the defendant did use all the means he possibly could, or such as the law requires; if you believe that he used all diligence in his power to keep from killing the mule,.it would be your duty to find, for the defendant.” The court immediately corrected the error complained of in this charge, as follows: “Now what I said about all diligence just now I correct that to this extent — exercise…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. HatcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Morrison v. DickeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Criswell Baking Co. v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. City of Camilla v. MayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. McDuffie v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Jackson v. ElyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API