Legal Opinion

East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1895PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Henry. Eloyd superior court. March term, 1894.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

1. Under section 2067 of the code, carriers of passengers are required to exercise extraordinary care and diligence to protect the lives and persons of their passengers, and are not liable for personal injuries after having used such diligence. Under this section there certainly can be no doubt that if a railroad company fails to exercise this degree of diligence for the safety of its passengers, it will be liable for injuries occasioned because of such failure to a passenger who himself exercised the proper care for his own protection.

Section 3038 of the code makes a…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Alabama Midland Railway Co. v. GuilfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Florida, Central & Peninsular Railroad v. LucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. GillelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API