State ex rel. Thompson v. Gonzalez
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 174 Ohio St.3d 508.] THE STATE EX REL. THOMPSON, APPELLANT , v. GONZALEZ, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Thompson v. Gonzalez,
2024-Ohio-897.] Prohibition—Mandamus—Because relator’s complaint was obviously meritless, court of appeals did not err in sua sponte dismissing complaint—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2023-1070—Submitted February 6, 2024—Decided March 14, 2024.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-23-1158,
2023-Ohio-2665. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Appellant, Goldy…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State ex rel. Waters v. SpaethOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Mayer v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Mayer v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- In re J.J.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Scott v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Jackson v. McNamaraOhio Supreme Court · 2025
- Lowe v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2025
- State ex rel. Robinson v. PageOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State ex rel. McKee v. O'ShaughnessyOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State ex rel. Tentman v. SundermannOhio Supreme Court · 2025