Legal Opinion

Pro Excavating, Inc. v. Ziebart

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 1997No. 95C-11868; CA A92784PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment for defendants in an action to foreclose a construction lien. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff is a licensed excavating contractor that contracted with a developer to install street, storm drain, sanitary sewer and domestic water improvements for a new subdivision. The site preparation contract between plaintiff and the developer provided:

“The term ‘Engineer’ wherever used in this contract shall be Multi/Tech Engineering Services, Inc., or [its] duly authorized representative. * * * The Engineer shall have full authority to interpret the plans and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fox & Co. v. Roman Catholic BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Avery v. ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Christenson v. BehrensOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Carl v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Dallas Lumber & Supply Co. v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ken Hood Construction Co. v. Pacific Coast Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Bethlehem Constr., Inc. v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API