Legal Opinion
Pro Excavating, Inc. v. Ziebart
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 11, 1997No. 95C-11868; CA A92784PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment for defendants in an action to foreclose a construction lien. We reverse and remand.
Plaintiff is a licensed excavating contractor that contracted with a developer to install street, storm drain, sanitary sewer and domestic water improvements for a new subdivision. The site preparation contract between plaintiff and the developer provided:
“The term ‘Engineer’ wherever used in this contract shall be Multi/Tech Engineering Services, Inc., or [its] duly authorized representative. * * * The Engineer shall have full authority to interpret the plans and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fox & Co. v. Roman Catholic BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Avery v. ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Christenson v. BehrensOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Carl v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Dallas Lumber & Supply Co. v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ken Hood Construction Co. v. Pacific Coast Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Bethlehem Constr., Inc. v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019