Legal Opinion

Brendle's Exr. v. Brendle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1922No. Appeal, No. 204Published

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

John H. Brendle, now deceased, was a hard drinker; September 20,1916, all his children, including appellees, signed a petition setting forth that he was an habitual drunkard and praying the appointment of a committee to take charge of his estate. Brendle, to avoid the intended proceeding, decided to put his property in trust. October 3,1916, he went to the office of an attorney in Lancaster, accompanied by appellees, also by a daughter, Martha Yetter, and his daughter-in-law, Ida L. Brendle. Before these witnesses, he told the attorney, in a general way, what he wanted. Within a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rynd v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Stockett v. RyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Willard v. Integrity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API