Stockett v. Ryan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 42, July T., 1895, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Lancaster Co., Equity Docket No. 3, p. 87, sitting in equity. Bill in equity for the cancellation of a deed, of trust.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 42, July T., 1895, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Lancaster Co., Equity Docket No. 3, p. 87, sitting in equity. Bill in equity for the cancellation of a deed, of trust. The case was heard upon bill, answer and proofs, and Livingston, P. J., filed the following opinion: This proceeding originated in, and arises out of, a certain deed of trust, of which the following is a copy: “ This indenture, made the tenth day of July, A. D. 1890, between Joseph Fraley, of the city of Lancaster, in the county of Lancaster and state of Pennsylvania, of the one part, and I. H. Ryan, also of…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The findings of fact made by the learned judge sitting as a chancellor in this case fully justify the decree appealed from. These findings are not absolutely conclusive upon us, but until error in them is clearly shown, they should be allowed to stand. We have examined the evidence with a view to satisfy ourselves whether these findings can be fairly made from it, and we are not persuaded that any one of them should be overturned. The decree is affirmed. Costs to be paid by the appellant.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Steinmeyer v. SiebertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Rekas v. DopkavichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Long v. Tradesmens Natl. B. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Altaffer v. Anderson Automobile Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Canavan v. PayeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.