Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Board of Selectmen of Wrentham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 18, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

We are asked in this case to interpret G. L. c. 32B, § 7A, a local option statute which permits municipalities to contribute more than 50% of their employees’ group insurance premiums. 3 In particular, we must de cide whether § 7A empowered the Wrentham town meeting to set unilaterally the town’s rate of contribution toward the group health and life insurance provided to the town’s employees. We conclude that § 7A did not authorize the town meeting’s action and reverse a Superior Court judgment that made a contrary determination.

The background of the case is as follows. On December 14, 1987,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. School Committee of Newton v. Labor Relations Comm.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Daddario v. City of PittsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Commonwealth v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Labor Relations Commission v. Town of NatickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Ass'n of Government Employees v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Ludlow Education Ass'n v. Town of LudlowMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. City of Somerville v. Commonwealth Employment Relations BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. Twomey v. Town of MiddleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  5. Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API