Claim of Kaplan v. Zodiac Watch Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
The sole issue before us on this appeal is whether claimant, who has already received disability insurance benefits, is also entitled to workmen’s compensation benefits on the ground that his injury arose out of as well as in the course of his employment.
The Appellate Division, in affirming the award of compensation to claimant by the Workmen’s Compensation Board, held that the board was warranted in finding as a question of fact that claimant’s injury was work connected, but where, as here, the facts are undisputed, only a question of law is presented (Matter of Martin v. Plant, 293 N. Y.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Lewis v. Knappen Tippetts Abbett Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Matter of Lepow v. Lepow Knitting Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Matter of Martin v. PlautNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Matter of Underhill v. KeenerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Claim of Lief v. A. Walzer & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
3Cited by9 opinions
- Capizzi v. Southern District Reporters, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Claim of Van Horn v. Red Hook Central SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Claim of Pagano v. Anheuser Busch, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Cole v. Union Carbide Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- O'Rourke v. LongNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.