Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 12, 2008No. 06-11612PublishedCited by 174 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

If the parties consent, federal magistrate judges may preside over the voir dire and selection of prospective jurors in a felony criminal trial. Peretz v. United States, 501 U. S. 923, 933 (1991). This case presents the question whether it suffices for counsel alone to consent to the magistrate judge’s role in presiding over voir dire and jury selection or whether the defendant must give his or her own consent.

*244Homero Gonzalez was charged in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas on five felony-drug offense counts. He is the petitioner here. At the outset of jury…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by174 opinions

  1. McCoy v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Mozell v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API