Legal Opinion

Pacific Power & Light v. Heermann

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1994No. 93-207PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Chief Justice.

Appellant Pacific Power & Light (hereinafter PP&L) appeals from the district court’s order which affirmed the hearing examiner’s award of permanent partial disability benefits to Appellee Wendy K. Heermann.

We affirm.

PP&L presents five issues:

1. The Office of Administrative Hearings ... erred in ostensibly finding that Appellee ... proved a causal relationship between her current physical condition and a work place injury. No physician has ever diagnosed her current physical condition, therefore, the etiology of that condition cannot be deemed to be work-related.

2. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Romero v. Davy McKee Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mekss v. Wyoming Girls' SchoolWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Farbotnik v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Pearson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Allen v. Natrona County School District No. OneWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim Of: Marty D. McIntosh v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Meyer v. RodabaughWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API