Pacific Power & Light v. Heermann
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Chief Justice.
Appellant Pacific Power & Light (hereinafter PP&L) appeals from the district court’s order which affirmed the hearing examiner’s award of permanent partial disability benefits to Appellee Wendy K. Heermann.
We affirm.
PP&L presents five issues:
1. The Office of Administrative Hearings ... erred in ostensibly finding that Appellee ... proved a causal relationship between her current physical condition and a work place injury. No physician has ever diagnosed her current physical condition, therefore, the etiology of that condition cannot be deemed to be work-related.
2. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Romero v. Davy McKee Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Mekss v. Wyoming Girls' SchoolWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Farbotnik v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Pearson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Allen v. Natrona County School District No. OneWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim Of: Marty D. McIntosh v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Meyer v. RodabaughWyoming Supreme Court · 1999