Legal Opinion

COFUND II LLC v. HITACHI CAPITAL AMERICA CORP.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 20, 2019No. 2:16-cv-01790Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY COFUND II LLC, Case No. 16-cv-1790 (SDW) (LDW) Plaintiff, v. OPINION HITACHI CAPITAL AMERICA CORP., November 20, 2019 Defendant. WIGENTON, District Judge. Before this Court is Defendant Hitachi Capital America Corp.’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56. Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1332(a)(1). Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391. This opinion is issued pursuant to Rule 78. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Service National Rural Letter Carriers Association John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API