Legal Opinion
Inficon, Inc. v. Verionix, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 19, 2016No. 15 Civ. 8044PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Sweet, District Judge
The plaintiff Inficon (“Inficon” or the “Plaintiff’) has moved pursuant to Federal Arbitration Act § 101(a)(3) to vacate the arbitration award issued by the International Centre for Dispute Resolution International Arbitration Tribunal dated August 19, 2015 (“the Award”). Defendant Verionix, Inc. (“Verionix” or the “Defendant”) has cross moved to confirm the Award. Upon the conclusions set forth below, the motion of Inficon is denied, the cross motion of Verionix is granted, and the Award is confirmed,
Prior Proceedings
Inficon filed its complaint on October 13, 2015…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred PickholzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as CharterersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Ashland Management Inc. v. JanienNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Yusuf Ahmed Alghanim & Sons, W.L.L. v. Toys "R" Us, Inc. Tru (Hk) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Westerbeke Corporation v. Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Holland Loader Co. v. Flsmidth A/SDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Oracle Corp. v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Holland Loader Company v. FLSmidthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- InspiRX Inc. v. Lupin Atlantis Holdings SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Lakah v. UBS AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.