Legal Opinion
Holland Loader Company v. FLSmidth
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 3, 2019No. 18-1643-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
18‐1643‐cv Holland Loader Company v. FLSmidth UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURTʹS LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ʺSUMMARY ORDERʺ). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. v. AEP Power Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Kreisler v. Second Avenue Diner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Travellers International, A.G. And Windsor, Inc. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.