Mackey v. State ex rel. Smith
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Lake Superior Court, Virgil S. Reiter, Judge. Proceedings in quo warranto by the State of Indiana, on relation of Matthew Smith and others. From a judgment for relators, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, C. J.
— This is a proceeding in quo warranto instituted by appellee for the purpose of ousting appellants as members of the board of school trustees in the school town of Hobart in Lake county. In prosecuting this appeal from a judgment for the relators, appellants appear to rely on five assignments of error which challenge respectively the action of the trial court: (1) In overruling a motion to separate the various causes of action alleged to be stated in the complaint; (2) in overruling a motion to make the complaint more specific; and (3) in overruling the separate demurrer of each appellant to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taylor v. SchradskyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Gary & Interurban Railway Co. v. HackerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Pugh v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Princess Amusement Co. v. MetzgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chicago District Electric Generating Corp. v. EvansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
- Karen L. Gilday, and James K. Gilday v. Jeanine L. Motsay, and Edward W. OchoaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. HornyakIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- First National Bank v. GarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Poff v. McKilip, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1939