Legal Opinion

Spore v. Camac Veneer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 13, 1983No. 78-3734; CA A25300PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

The plaintiff in this personal injury action is employed by Pinkerton, Inc. He sustained an on-the-job injury at defendant’s plant, to which he was assigned as a security guard by Pinkerton. Plaintiffs action was dismissed by the trial court, which made special findings and concluded that defendant was a “mutual employer” of plaintiff and, as such, was immune from the action under the Workers’ Compensation Law. See ORS 656.018. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.

Plaintiffs arguments on appeal relate to the trial court’s findings and conclusions that defendant, together with Pinkerton, had the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Omark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Robinson v. Omark Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Matter of Marriage of ClementCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bowens v. Allied Warehousing Services, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Childress v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Anthony Lancaster Karen Lancaster v. E.S.S. Corporation, an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API