Legal Opinion

Anthony Lancaster Karen Lancaster v. E.S.S. Corporation, an Arizona Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1992No. 90-35712Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

959 F.2d 240

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Anthony LANCASTER; Karen Lancaster, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

E.S.S. CORPORATION, an Arizona corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-35712.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 3, 1992.

Decided April 3, 1992.

Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, O'SCANNLAIN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Omark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Martelli v. RA Chambers and AssociatesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Robinson v. Omark Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Blacknall v. Westwood CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Matter of Marriage of ClementCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API