Legal Opinion
Charles Ray Johnson v. Sam On Demand
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided January 6, 2026No. 4:25-cv-04124Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION CHARLES RAY JOHNSON, 4:25-CV-04124-ECS Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO vs. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SAM ON DEMAND, APPOINT COUNSEL, AND 1915 SCREENING FOR DISMISSAL Defendant. Plaintiff Charles Ray Johnson filed a pro se lawsuit alleging discrimination and retaliation. Doc. 1. Johnson also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a motion to appoint counsel. Docs. 3, 4. I. Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis A federal court…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.