Windsor Redrying Co. Ex Rel. Gillam v. Gurley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The only question we think necessary to consider: Is this action barred by the statute of limitations ? We think not.
The defendants plead the three-year statute of limitations, C. S. 441(1) : “Upon a contract, obligation or liability arising out of a contract, express or implied, except those mentioned in the preceding sections.”
This is a general statute and it must be construed in pari materia with the statutes relating to corporations.
Section 1165, C. S., in part, is as follows: “The directors of a corporation may, from time to time, make assessments upon the shares of stock subscribed for,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hawkins v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hatch v. DanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Glenn v. LiggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Glenn v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Glenn v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ellington v. Raleigh Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Hood Ex Rel. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Hood Ex Rel. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936