Legal Opinion

Windsor Redrying Co. Ex Rel. Gillam v. Gurley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The only question we think necessary to consider: Is this action barred by the statute of limitations ? We think not.

The defendants plead the three-year statute of limitations, C. S. 441(1) : “Upon a contract, obligation or liability arising out of a contract, express or implied, except those mentioned in the preceding sections.”

This is a general statute and it must be construed in pari materia with the statutes relating to corporations.

Section 1165, C. S., in part, is as follows: “The directors of a corporation may, from time to time, make assessments upon the shares of stock subscribed for,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Hatch v. DanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Glenn v. LiggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Glenn v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Glenn v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellington v. Raleigh Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Hood Ex Rel. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Hood Ex Rel. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API