Legal Opinion
Funderburk v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided April 15, 2016No. Civil Case No. 3:15-cv-04660-JMCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
J. MICHELLE CHILDS, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Sharon and Thomas Funder-burk (“Plaintiffs”) filed this action seeking *573damages from Defendant South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (“SCE & G”) for the damage caused to their home by flood water released from Lake Murray when SCE & G opened floodgates. (ECF No. 1-1 at 5-12.)
This matter is before the court pursuant to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand the case to the Lexington County (South Carolina) Court of Common Pleas. (ECF No. 5.) SCE & G opposes the Motion to Remand and asks the court to retain jurisdiction. (ECF No.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carrington v. City of Tacoma, Department of Public Utilities, Light DivisionDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Mullins v. Dominion Energy South Carolina IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- PAXTON v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2022
- Sanders v. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022