Legal Opinion
Andrew Jergens Co. v. Bonded Products Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 23, 1927No. 263PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the faets as above). The defendant contends that it is privileged to do whatever William. A. Woodbury may lawfully do, and that prior litigation has already adjudicated that plaintiff cannot enjoin William A. Woodbury from trading in the manner complained of. This requires a somewhat detailed examination of the prior litigation.
The first case in point of time is Jergens Co. v. Woodbury, 197 N. Y. 66, 90 N. E. 344. This was a suit brought by plaintiff’s predecessor in 1907 against John H. Woodbury and the Woodbury-McGrath Company to prevent their marketing soap as “Woodbury’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Shaver v. Heller & Merz Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- N. K. Fairbank Co. v. R. W. Bell Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Corning Glass Works v. Jeannette Glass CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Barton v. Rex-Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. LawsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938
- Ives Laboratories, Inc. v. Darby Drug Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.