Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injury Fund v. Howes

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 25, 1971No. 253, September Term, 1970PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

An accidental injury sustained on June 16, 1966 by William Oliver Howes during the course of his employment as a furnace cleaner for Metropolitan Fuels Company, Inc., was followed in due course by his compensation claim. Further proceedings arising out of the claim require us to determine what the Subsequent Injury Fund is, and what it may do and must do under Maryland law. This appeal by the Subsequent Injury Fund was taken from an “opinion and order” of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County granting a motion by Howes for summary judgment. Hereafter in this opinion we shall refer to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Subsequent Injury Fund v. PackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Switkes v. John McShain, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  3. Richard F. Kline, Inc. v. GroshCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Subsequent Injury Fund v. ChapmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Subsequent Injury Fund v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Subsequent Injury Fund v. EhrmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Felger v. NicholsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Subsequent Injury Fund v. RinehartCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API