Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brager v. Friedenwald

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 5, 1916Published

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Dubby, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Dissent

Stockbridge, J.,

delivered the following dissenting opinion, in which Boyd, O. J., concurred:

A careful study of the record in this case leads me to a different conclusion from that of the majority of the Court. There will be no attempt to review all the details of the case, but only to point out certain matters which do not appear to me to have been given their proper weight.

The action is one for deceit and the defendants in this case are six of the children of the late Joseph Friedenwald, viz., Jacob II., Benjamin B. and Hiram Friedenwald, Mrs. Hecht, Mrs. Thalheimer and Mrs. Goldenberg.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Fitzpatrick v. FlannaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Simon v. Goodyear Metallic Rubber Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API