Legal Opinion

Plaza Department Store, Inc. v. Duchnak

High Court of American Samoa

Decided July 1, 1994No. CA No. 15-91Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order Denying Motion for Partial Summary Judgment:

The motion now before this court is for partial summary judgment, brought by defendants/cross-defendants Cigna Property and Casualty Company ("Cigna"), against defendant/cross-claimant Marty Duchnak ("Duchnak"). For the reasons detailed below we deny Cigna's motion.

Summary judgment, in whole or in part, is appropriate where the pleadings and supporting papers show "that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." T.C.R.C.P. Rule 56. In ruling on such a motion, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. John Ellison, Sr., John Ellison, Jr., and Vince J. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Enterprise Tools, Inc. & E.B. Bennett v. Export-Import Bank of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. Johnson v. United Investors Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Mark Watson, Charles W. Watson and Norma L. Watson v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API