Legal Opinion
Mueller v. Eucenham
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 12, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
33 N.J. Super. 156 (1954)
109 A.2d 462
HAROLD G. MUELLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DANIEL EUCENHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND DANIEL EVERNHAM, JR., AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, DANIEL EVERNHAM, AND DORIS EVERNHAM, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM DANIEL EVERNHAM, INTERVENING-COUNTERCLAIMANTS-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 20, 1954.
Decided November 12, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.
Mr. Jerome S. Lieb argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Harkavy & Lieb, attorneys; Mr. Abraham I. Harkavy and Mr. Lieb, of counsel).
Mr.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New York Life Insurance v. DunlevySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Broad & Branford Place Corp. v. J. J. Hockenjos Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- Kelleher v. LozziSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grober v. KahnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Gowran v. Wawa, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Barbire v. WryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- State, in Interest of FmNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979