Legal Opinion
D. I. Nofziger Lumber Co. v. Waters
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 1909No. Civ. No. 606PublishedCited by 9 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff sues to foreclose two liens (one claimed in its own right and the other as assignee) for materials furnished and used in the construction of a building for defendant Waters. Judgment went for Waters, and plaintiff appeals therefrom on the judgment-roll.
Waters entered into a written contract with one Watkins, a contractor, whereby the latter agreed for the consideration specified in said contract, to be paid in installments as therein provided, to construct for Waters a building upon lot 18 in block 5 of the Hutchinson tract in the city of Los Angeles, California, the cost of which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Willamette Steam Mills Co. v. KremerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Snell v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Southern California Lumber Co. v. SchmittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Goodrich Lumber Co. v. DavieMontana Supreme Court · 1893
- Fernandez v. BurlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Wand Corp. v. San Gabriel Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Ackerson v. Albuquerque Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Manquero v. Turlock Joint Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.