Legal Opinion
Salm v. Moses
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 2009PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff commenced this dental malpractice action against defendant based on his allegedly negligent failure to repair an oral fistula. At trial, defendant moved in limine to preclude plaintiff from cross-examining defendant’s expert regarding the fact that he and defendant were both shareholders of and insured by the same dental malpractice insurance company, OMS National Insurance Company (OMSNIC). Plaintiff opposed the motion, but did not request a voir dire of the expert to inquire into his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Feldsberg v. NitschkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Leotta v. PlessingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Simpson v. . Foundation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Oltarsh v. Aetna InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Loughlin v. . BrassilNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Richmor Aviation, Inc. v. Sportsflight Air, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- SIEMUCHA, PAUL v. GARRISON, ROBERT D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Zaire D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Revell v. GuidoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Acquest Wehrle, LLC v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.