Legal Opinion
United States v. Pangang Group Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 23, 2012No. CR 11-00573 JSWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SPECIALLY APPEARING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF INDICTMENT
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Motion to Quash Service of the Indictment, filed by specially-appearing defendants, Pangang Group Company, Ltd. (“Pangang Group”), Pan-gang Group Steel Vanadium & Titanium Company, Ltd. (“PGSVTC”), Pangang Group Titanium Industry, Ltd. (“Titanium”), and Pangang Group International Economic & Trading Company (“PIETC”) (collectively, the “Pangang Defendants”).
The Court has considered the parties’ papers,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Doe v. Unocal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes and Charles PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Corcoran v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Stewart v. Screen Gems-Emi Music, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Barantsevich v. VTB BankDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- United States v. Kolon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013