Legal Opinion
Thorneal v. Cape Pond Ice Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 2, 1947PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
On July 1, 1944, the plaintiff, a fisherman by trade but not at that time employed, was hired by the master of a fishing vessel owned by the defendant Linquata to “ice up” the vessel with crushed ice to be supplied by the defendant Cape Pond Ice Company at its wharf in Gloucester. On that same day the plaintiff, while upon the vessel, which was in navigable water at the wharf, and, while using an iron chute owned by the defendant Cape Pond Ice Company to convey the ice into the hold of the vessel, was injured, as he contends, by a defect in the chute.
The declaration is in four counts. Count 1…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jansson v. Swedish American LineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
- Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. AmiraultCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- Haggerty v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Howes v. KelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.