Legal Opinion
In Re Young
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas
Decided August 28, 2003No. 19-40317PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONALD R. SHARP, Chief Judge.
NOW before the Court is the Debtor’s Amended Motion To Determine Property as Exempt filed by Scott Arthur Young (“Debtor”). The Court considered the pleadings filed and the evidence adduced at trial. This opinion constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Fed.R.Bankr.Proc. 7052 and disposes of all issues before the Court.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Debtor filed his voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 together with his Schedules and Statement of Financial Affairs as required under 11 U.S.C. § 521. Included…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Goff v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- In Re: Wayne E. Bell, Jr., Debtor. Wayne E. Bell, Jr. v. Deborah BellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Sears v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Cleveland v. ClevelandTexas Supreme Court · 1896
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Houston Pipeline Co. v. Bank of America, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Houston Pipeline Company, LP v. Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and as Representative of the Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee of the Bammel Gas Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006