Legal Opinion
State v. Palmer
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 2008No. KW2008-621PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOKS, Judge.
| STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The State charged Defendant Marty Palmer with possession of Lortab, a violation of La. R.S. 40:968(A). Defendant filed a Motion To Suppress Evidence. After a hearing on the motion, the trial court denied Defendant’s Motion To Suppress. Defendant seeks relief from the denial of his motion by application for supervisory writs to this court. Defendant alleges two assignments of error arguing that he was illegally arrested and the evidence subsequently seized from his vehicle was a product of that illegal arrest and not a voluntary consent to search.
STATEMENT…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. KinchenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS PRESTON KINCHEN AKA STEVEN HALL AKA STEVEN WEBBLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011