Legal Opinion

Drummond v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1970No. 5898PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

Drummond and Riley were convicted of robbery. On this direct appeal they contend that their Sixth Amendment right to be confronted with the witnesses against them was violated when the trial court allowed the State to offer in evidence, over appropriate objection, the testimony of the robbery victim given at the preliminary examination. We are asked to void their convictions and remand for another trial since a violation of this fundamental constitutional right cannot be deemed harmless error. Messmore v. Fogliani, 82 Nev. 153, 156, 413 P.2d 306 (1966).

The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Deutscher v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  2. City of Las Vegas v. WalshNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Barker v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Aesoph v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hogan v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API