Aesoph v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Following a jury trial, appellant Gerald Aesoph was convicted of first degree murder, burglary and robbery with use of a deadly weapon. After review of Aesoph’s assignments of error, we conclude that prosecutorial misconduct constituted reversible error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
THE FACTS
On the evening of April 28, 1982, Gerald Aesoph shot and killed William Apfel, aka Bill Martin, in Apfel’s home. At trial, Aesoph claimed that he shot Apfel in self-defense. The state argued that Aesoph committed premeditated murder. Except for Aesoph, there were no witnesses…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by30 opinions
- Chavez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- McConnell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Leonard v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Ross v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Bennett v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.