Legal Opinion

Aesoph v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1986No. 16540PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Following a jury trial, appellant Gerald Aesoph was convicted of first degree murder, burglary and robbery with use of a deadly weapon. After review of Aesoph’s assignments of error, we conclude that prosecutorial misconduct constituted reversible error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

THE FACTS

On the evening of April 28, 1982, Gerald Aesoph shot and killed William Apfel, aka Bill Martin, in Apfel’s home. At trial, Aesoph claimed that he shot Apfel in self-defense. The state argued that Aesoph committed premeditated murder. Except for Aesoph, there were no witnesses…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by30 opinions

  1. Chavez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. McConnell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Leonard v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ross v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Bennett v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API