Legal Opinion
Bloomingdale v. Bloomingdale
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 18, 1939No. Appeal No. 9PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The Supreme Court has the power and jurisdiction to hear and determine the rights of the parties in this entire *232controversy. In Matter of Malloy (278 N. Y. 429, at p. 432) the Court of Appeals said: “ The Supreme Court is a court of general jurisdiction. It may take the account of a trustee, probate a will, and exercise jurisdiction in many other matters where the Surrogate’s Court also has jurisdiction. The Legislature cannot by statute deprive it of one particle of its jurisdiction, derived from the Constitution (Art. VI), although it may grant concurrent jurisdiction to some other court,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re the Estate of MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Garlock v. . VandevortNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Ludwig v. BungartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- In re the Estate of DeutschNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
- In re the Estate of FaisalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of United States Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941