Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 17, 1949No. 6 Div. 795PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

There is only one question presented by this appeal, raised by demurrer to count 11. That is, whether there can be maintained a civil action in case for causing the malicious prosecution of plaintiff in the recorder’s court for the violation of a city ordinance without alleging that plaintiff was arrested on the charge.

Defendant may cause plaintiff to be maliciously prosecuted in the recorder’s court for the violation of a city ordinance, either by causing a warrant to issue and her arrest on it, or by causing notice to be given her to appear before the recorder at a certain…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rich v. McInernySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. McKinstry v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Sanders v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Chaney v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Strain v. IrwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barbara A. Nesmith and Richard A. Nesmith v. H. D. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. Ex Parte HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Grider v. City of AuburnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009
  4. Prince v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Blake v. Barton Williams, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API