Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Alexander
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
There is only one question presented by this appeal, raised by demurrer to count 11. That is, whether there can be maintained a civil action in case for causing the malicious prosecution of plaintiff in the recorder’s court for the violation of a city ordinance without alleging that plaintiff was arrested on the charge.
Defendant may cause plaintiff to be maliciously prosecuted in the recorder’s court for the violation of a city ordinance, either by causing a warrant to issue and her arrest on it, or by causing notice to be given her to appear before the recorder at a certain…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rich v. McInernySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- McKinstry v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Sanders v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Chaney v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Strain v. IrwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barbara A. Nesmith and Richard A. Nesmith v. H. D. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Ex Parte HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Grider v. City of AuburnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009
- Prince v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Blake v. Barton Williams, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.