Legal Opinion

United States v. Games-Perez

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 23, 2012No. 11-1011PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Defendant and appellant Miguel Games-Perez was indicted for possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Claiming that he was unaware that he was actually a felon, Mr. Games-Perez filed a motion in limine, seeking a pre-trial ruling that the government was required to prove that he actually knew he was a felon. When that motion was denied, Mr. Games-Perez filed a motion to enter a conditional guilty plea under Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2), asking to reserve the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion in limine. The district…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. United States v. Charles WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Malik NasirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API