Braten v. Baker
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Dissent 1
Opinion of
2Dissent · ParkerJustice Parker
I regret that I cannot concur with the views of my colleagues. In my opinion, the judgment should be affirmed.
Although dissents often tend toward uncertainty in a field of the law rather than toward clarification, I feel obligated in this instance to present my reasons.
The statement of the case heretofore made would seem to be sufficient if there be added thereto the portions of the original agreement which dealt with termination and prohibition against assignment. They are as follows:
*294Termination: “The terms of this lease shall begin on the first day of March 1950 and continue…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Larsen Sheep Co. v. SjogrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Peterson v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
- Gilbert v. Van KleeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Burrows Motor Co. v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.