In re the Rehabilitation of Segregated Account of Ambac Assurance Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.
¶ 1. This case requires us to answer a threshold question concerning whether an appeal in this insurance company rehabilitation case may go forward. The court of appeals granted the motion of the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (Commissioner) to dismiss the appeal by the United States.1 The Commissioner had argued that the appeal should be dismissed either on the grounds that the notice of appeal was fundamentally defective such that the court of appeals had no jurisdiction or on the grounds that the United States had waived its right to appeal issues by failing to appear in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- James Borden v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- The Segregated Account of Ambac Assurance Corporation v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Roger Choinsky v. Germantown School District Board of EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Choinsky v. Germantown Sch. Dist. Bd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
- City of Eau Claire v. Melissa M. BoothWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Eau Claire v. Melissa M. BoothWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.