State v. Wahl
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Appellant David Wahl was convicted of first degree burglary. Minn.Stat. § 609.-582, subd. 1(c) (1984). He claims that he was denied a fair trial by the admission of improper Spreigl evidence, by improper inquiry into a prior burglary conviction and by prosecutorial misconduct in closing argument. He also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.
PACTS
Cecile Bell was at home asleep and was awakened around 4:30 a.m. by an individual touching the lower part of her abdomen over her nightgown. She observed the intruder wore a blue plaid shirt, a white mask…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CrockerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. GouldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. WiskowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993