Legal Opinion
Garcia v. Hudak
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 5, 2016No. Civil Action No. 15 CV 1393PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION
CHARLES R. NORGLE, United States District Court Judge
Plaintiff Sergio Garcia (“Plaintiff’) brings his First Amended Complaint against Officers Matthew Hudak (“Hu-dak”), Terrance O’Brien (“O’Brien”), Pa-mon Mir (“Mir”) (collectively the “Individual Defendants”), and the Village of Schaumburg (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that the Individual Defendants violated Plaintiffs due process rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.1 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ghiles v. Municipal Electoral Board/Commissioners of Chicago Heights, IL.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- In Re: Watts Coordinated Pretrial ProceedingsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- In Re: Watts Coordinated Pretrial ProceedingsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Powell v. ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018