Legal Opinion

Guangzhou Liyuan Technology Co Ltd v. Arthur Chao-Chung Wu

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 30, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00157Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 GUANGZHOU LIYUAN TECHNOLOGY CASE NO. 2:26-cv-00157-JHC 8 CO LTD, Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 ARTHUR CHAO-CHUNG WU, 11 Defendant. 12 13 I 14 INTRODUCTION 15 This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Temporary 16 Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Dkt. # 5. Plaintiff asks the Court to enjoin 17 Defendant from enforcing

U.S. Patent No. 12,281,764 B2, which has led to the removal of 18 Plaintiff’s products from Amazon.com.

Id. at 7. 19 For the reasons below, the Court DENIES…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Reno Air Racing Association, Inc. v. Jerry McCordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API