Legal Opinion

Mello v. Board of Water Supply

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1935No. 2117PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PARSONS, J.

This is an action entitled in assumpsit and tried in the circuit court jury waived. At the conclusion of plain tiff’s evidence defendant moved “for a judgment on the pleadings, on the ground that there is a failure of proof to conform to the allegations specified in the contract.” The court, quoting from its written decision, “considered said motion as a motion for involuntary nonsuit,” and sustained the same, and judgment dismissing the cause at plaintiff’s costs was thereupon entered. The case is before us upon plaintiff’s hill of exceptions. The bill…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Murphy v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1872
  4. West v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Mello v. Auditor City CountyHawaii Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API