Lord v. Black Hills Mining Corp.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.
This action was brought for the purpose of foreclosing a purported miner’s lien. The defendant, Black Hills Mining Corporation, was operating a mine under a lease, containing an option to purchase. The lease among other things provided that “any machinery, equipment, tools belonging to the lessee a period of sixty days will be given for their removal upon the termination or forfeiture of this lease.” The plaintiffs performed labor for and furnished materials to the defendant mining corporation and subsequent to the discontinuance of mining operations, but before the lease was forfeited, filed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hathaway v. Davis & RankinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Eastern Ohio Oil Co. v. McEvoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Crutcher v. BlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Miller v. Bankers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Gates v. FredericksArizona Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Lien v. RoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Stoneberger v. DavisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989