Hathaway v. Davis & Rankin
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Clay District Court. Action brought by D. J. Davis and Thomas Rankin, partners as Davis & PanJdn, against C. M. Faulkner and O. J. Lyman, partners as Faulkner & Lyman, and 8. D. Hathaway and others, to foreclose a mechanics’ lien. Trial by the court, at the January Term, 1884, upon an agreed statement of facts. The opinion states the material facts, and the nature of the judgment rendered thereon. Defendants Hathaway and Moss bring the judgment here for review.
1Opinion of the Court
*694The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The questions involved in this case are simply with reference to the validity and priority of certain liens claimed to exist upon certain real estate, buildings, fixtures and machinery, belonging to the firm of Faulkner & Lyman. The facts are substantially as follows: Originally, L. PI. Culp owned 160 acres of land, ten acres of which he leased to Faulkner & Lyman for the purpose that they might erect and operate a creamery thereon. This lease was “for the term of one year, with the privilege of five years, from December, 1882, said…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Ward v. TOWN TAVERNOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Conley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Eastern Ohio Oil Co. v. McEvoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Toler v. SatterthwaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. FretzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.