Legal Opinion

Grisso v. Board of Medical Examiners

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1925No. Docket No. 5336PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal hy the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon an order sustaining a general and .special demurrer to an amended petition for writ of review.

The petition sets forth that Davis Grisso was a duly licensed and practicing physician and surgeon in the state of California; that a complaint was duly and regularly filed against him by the state Board of Medical Examiners, charging him with unprofessional conduct under section 14 of the Medical Practice Act, subdivision 8 thereof (Stats. 1913, p. 732, as amended by Stats. 1921, p. 1012); that he filed an answer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Suckow v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Lanterman v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Thrasher v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Anderson v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Berry v. AldersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitten v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Grisso v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API