Grisso v. Board of Medical Examiners
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an appeal hy the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon an order sustaining a general and .special demurrer to an amended petition for writ of review.
The petition sets forth that Davis Grisso was a duly licensed and practicing physician and surgeon in the state of California; that a complaint was duly and regularly filed against him by the state Board of Medical Examiners, charging him with unprofessional conduct under section 14 of the Medical Practice Act, subdivision 8 thereof (Stats. 1913, p. 732, as amended by Stats. 1921, p. 1012); that he filed an answer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Suckow v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Lanterman v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Thrasher v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Anderson v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Berry v. AldersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Whitten v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Grisso v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927