Legal Opinion

Schnakenberg v. Schnakenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHagarty, J.

This is an action by a widow, excluded as a beneficiary under the will of her deceased husband, to set aside a deed of trust made by her husband as a fraud upon her and as an illusory transfer. The relief sought is that she be awarded such portion of the property of decedent as forms a part of the trust fund under the deed of trust and which she would be entitled to take under the Decedent Estate Law (§ 83) had her husband died intestate. The sufficiency of the complaint is questioned on this appeal.

From the factual allegations of the complaint and the exhibits thereto annexed, it appears…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Murray v. Brooklyn Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. BurkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. In re the Accounting of MundNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
  3. Hart v. HartNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In re the Accounting of PerlmutterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  5. Mitchell v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API