Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Trombley

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 18, 2008No. 05-74850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

MARIANNE O. BATTANI, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the Court are Respondent’s Objections to Magistrate Judge Paul J. Ko-mives’ Report and Recommendation (Doc. #40). The Magistrate Judge, ruling on Petitioner’s application for the writ of ha-beas corpus, first rejected Petitioner’s claims that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) standard of review, 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), was unconstitutional. The Magistrate Judge then, after…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burch v. MillasDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  2. Okla. Coal. for Reprod. Justice v. ClineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  3. David Sanders v. Laura PlappertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026
  4. Desai v. BookerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  5. In re Pers. Restraint of Casmer Joseph VolkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API