Legal Opinion

Freshwater v. Belmont County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1991No. 90-1088PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Both parties and the BTA agreed that the income approach was the proper approach to valuation of the subject property. The narrow issue is whether, as appellant, contends, the BTA’s rejection of appellant’s use of reserves for replacements was unreasonable and unlawful. We find that it was.

Appraisal manuals and treatises can help in the valuation of real property.

The BTA acted unreasonably and unlawfully in refusing to consider reserves for replacements. Such reserves are proper items of expense to be utilized when estimating the true value of real property through an income approach. The…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fawn Lake Apartments v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Olmsted Falls Village Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Villa Park Ltd. v. Clark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Fabish v. HarnakOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Fawn Lake Apts. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API