Olmsted Falls Village Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We reverse the BTA’s decision and remand this matter to the BTA because the BTA based its decision on evidence that did not value the property as of the tax lien date.
R.C. 5715.19(A)(1)(d) authorizes a property owner to file complaints with a board of revision against determinations made by the county auditor concerning the true value of the owner’s property. According to R.C. 5715.19(D), “[t]he determination of any such complaint shall relate back to the date when the lien for taxes * * * for the current year attached * * *.” The lien for taxes for each year attaches on the first day of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Mahoning County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Wolf v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- SFZ Transportation, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Webb Corp. v. Lucas County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Akron Centre Plaza Ltd. Liability Co. v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Olmsted Falls Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Plain Local Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Freshwater v. Belmont County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- AP Hotels of Illinois, Inc. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.